This site is supported by partnerships with various hardware and softare vendors. I receive commissions on purchases made through our links to retailers. 

Raw Converter Shootout Part #1

by | Jun 23, 2018 | Photo Software Reviews | 0 comments


Most cameras, and even phones, provide the option to shoot RAW images, rather than JPEGs. There are many advantages to this:

  • Significantly increased ‘bit depth’ that allows for far more image processing afterwards.
  • Better dynamic range with the ability to correct exposure (to some degree, at least)
  • Ability to adjust White Balance
  • The ability to make multiple versions (standard, black and white, ‘arty’ and so on) of an images without sacrificing any quality.

But there is a downside: to gain the above benefits, the RAW image has to be ‘processed’ using software on a computer/tablet.

Some cameras come with a RAW converter such as Canon’s DPP, but most users end up using a commercial alternative, especially one that fits in with their workflow.

This series of articles compares several of the most popular RAW converters. It can’t be comprehensive – I don’t have access to every converter.

These are the converters I will be testing:

I will be testing the following features of each converter:

  1. Basic RAW processing speed
  2. Basic RAW processing quality
  3. Camera Lens Corrections
  4. Post processing options
  5. Full RAW processing speed
  6. Full RAW processing quality
  7. Integration in your workflow.

I will be testing them on a Windows 7 PC, 64 bit, I3 chip with 16GB RAM. Not the fastest system but not terribly slow either.

This article deals with items 1 and 2 on this list.

The test image:

Original Image, no processing

I chose this image because it has a wide dynamic range and has a lot of detail in it. It was taken with a Samsung NX1 (28MP) with the well regarded NX 16-50mm f2-2.8 lens at 20MM, F8, ISO 400, 25 second exposure using a polarisar and a 10 stop ND filter.

1. Basic RAW Processing Speed

I measure this from the time I click ‘Process’ (or whatever it is called) in the relevant program. I do not include the time spent getting the image into the program as that is hard to measure and each program has its own way of doing it.

In each case I’m applying no extra options – no camera/lens corrections, no noise reduction, no sharpening, no colour or white balance adjustments.

Photolemur presents a challenge as it is a ‘one stop shop’ that does everything when you click ‘Done’. However, it does have the facility to produce a converted file without applying any of it’s extra processing, so that’s what I’ve done here.

The image is output as a 16 bit .TIF file and is saved to an SSD, so write to disk time should be negligible.

The timings

Here are the results of the basic processing time test:

[wpdatatable id=5]

Quite a wide range of results, with Lightroom the clear winner. I’ve included Photolemur here but I don’t think the result is a true reflection of its processing speed. It still went through all its smart image processing stages and then produced the final image without applying any! Clearly, it wasn’t designed for this sort of test and I suspect that, when I do the full processing conversion test, its processing time will be unchanged.

I wonder if Lightroom’s algorithm is actually so much faster that the others, or if it is pre-processing the images a bit and caching the results. I don’t know, but it always feels the fastest when I use it.

The Quality

As the images have had no processing of any kind other than turning a RAW into a TIF the results should be identical. But are they?

Here are each of the images, sized to fit the screen just as an overview.

Click the image to go full screen…

[URISP id=116]

The result so far:

Thus far, Lightroom is definitely the fastest of the RAW processors tested here. There aren’t many differences between the results at this stage, with both Luminar and Photolemur recovering more shadow detail (see the bottom left corner) than the others. I suspect these two converters use the same processing engine, as the results are so similar.

Detail wise, there is very little in it.

However, this is not the end of the story. Far from it. But thus far Lightroom has a definite speed advantage.

For part 2 click here

Please Support Us

This site supports me and my family.

Please use our links to visit the vendor’s pages. It helps us at no extra cost to you.

Please contribute or send a gift, because that will help me to keep this site active.

All content is Copyright Andy Bell 2024



  1. Affinity Photo - Photoshop Alternative for £49? - Andy Bell Photography - […] is not. Then again, it would take an astonishingly good RAW converter to make me move away from DXO…
  2. RAW Converter Shootout 2019 - Andy Bell Photography - […] I last did this, I have moved away from Adobe products, so Lightroom/Camera Raw is not tested here. If…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Focus stacking, Luminar NEO, Photo Software Reviews, Photography techniques

Focus Like a Pro: Luminar NEO for Photographers

Focus Like A Pro with Focus Stacking - Luminar NEO tested Focus stacking is a technique used by photographers to achieve a greater depth of field in their images. This method involves taking multiple photos of the same scene, each with a different focus point, and then combining them into a single image with sharpness [...]

|Feb 21, 2024

Luminar NEO, Photo Software Reviews

Unleash Your Imagination: Exploring the Power of Luminar Neo AI for Photographers

Introduction to Luminar NEO AI for Photographers Luminar NEO AI is an impressive photo editing software that incorporates advanced artificial intelligence features. It takes photo editing to a whole new level with its intuitive AI-powered tools. With Luminar NEO AI, editing becomes a breeze as it automatically enhances images, corrects imperfections, and optimizes colors with [...]

|Jan 19, 2024

DXO Photo Lab, DXO Pure RAW
DXO Photo Lab 7

DXO Photo Lab 7 Review

DXO Photo Lab 7 Review This is a look at DXO Photo Lab, a review of its features. This time, I am not comparing it to anything else, although I will refer to comparisons I have made previously, when appropriate. Introduction to DXO Photo Lab 7 DXO Photo Lab 7, which I will simply refer [...]

|Jan 6, 2024

DXO Photo Lab, DXO Pure RAW, Luminar NEO, Photo Software Reviews, RAW Conversion, Skylum Luminar, Software Reviews, Topaz Labs, Topaz Photo AI

The ‘Holy Trinity’ of Photography Software

This blog post looks at the 'holy trinity' of photography software. Three products that, when combined, provide everything you need to develop your RAW images and edit your photos. There is some overlap between the three, as each continues to add to and refine their capabilities. Yet I don't view them as competing with each [...]

|Dec 5, 2023

A.I. Gigapixel, DeNoise AI, DXO Photo Lab, Gigapixel AI, Photo Ninja

Noise Wars – Who Is Winning? DXO Photo Lab 6 vs Topaz Photo AI

Introduction There are only two contenders in the noise wars (IMHO) – DXO Photo Lab and Topaz DeNoise/Photo AI. These two have class leading image noise reduction and I have reviewed them numerous times. Towards the end of 2022, both DXO and Topaz issued new versions of their products. DXO released Photo Lab 6 with [...]

|Jan 21, 2023

A.I. Gigapixel, AB Photo Tools, Digital Image Workflow, Gigapixel AI, Photo Software Reviews
Enlarging a portrait - results

Image Resize Without Losing Quality using Topaz Gigapixel AI

How to do an Image Resize Without Losing Quality Easy! Just put it into Photoshop and do a re-sample, right? Absolutely not! If you are enlarging an image, you face this reality - pixels need to be added and your image's quality will suffer. But only if you use a standard method, such as bicubic [...]

|Jul 24, 2021

Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner