Photo Software Reviews

28 Comments on Topaz AI Gigapixel – a further review

  1. Pingback: AI Gigapixel Review - worth the cost? - Andy Bell Photography

  2. B. Clifton

    For me, a more practical everyday use of AI Gigapixel is with low resolution images. The downsized jpg images received from family members who then want it printed. Genuine Fractals was the first of this type of software, but it had limitations in how well it worked with random patterns in nature. AI Gigapixel does amazing things even with ripples in water. Now I have a tool that really works!

    • AndyBell

      That’s a good point. I haven’t tested it on such images and it’s making wonder how it would do with scans of old photos…

      I feel another test coming on!

  3. Douglas Ritchie

    I agree 100% with your review, Andy, I use it on already high-resolution images from a Nikon D810 and 850 and the results are fantastic, especially on images larger than 36 x24 inches. I was asked to do a 60 x40 inch print and was gobsmacked at the detail and sharpness.

    • AndyBell

      I recently upsized an old EOS 300D (a 6mp camera) to do a 60×40 print. I didn’t think anything could manage that but A.I. Gigapixel produced a perfectly acceptable upscale.

      It’s astonishingly good…

    • AndyBell

      I know – it seems crazy. I can push old EOS 300D images to 60 inches! It shouldn’t be possible. But it is!

      Their new sharpening/unblur/focus correction tool is also great. I’ll be reviewing it soon…

      • Douglas Ritchie

        Thanks for your reply Andy, I also have been very surprised with Topaz Ai Sharp, again amazing results with no artifacts or haloing.

  4. Steve McKenzie

    I agree, Gigapixel is incredible. I use it primarily on iphone images, but if I had to enlarge an image from my DSLR, I would definitely use it. Thanks for your review!

  5. Geoff Caplan

    It seems to me that a valuable application that you don’t mention is cropping to extend the reach of your lens.

    For example, rather than carry a zoom, you could use one of two fast primes or use one of the fine fixed-lens compacts.

    I suspect that cropping a prime lens image and enlarging with Gigapixel would give excellent results compared to a zoom while lightening your load – fast zooms are heavy buggers to lug around…

    • AndyBell

      That’s a good observation. Thankfully it’s easy to test as I can compare my 85mm prime with my 70-300 mm zoom at various focal lengths and see what the result is.

      Expect a new post soon…

    • AndyBell

      As far as I can tell the metadata problem occurred with Topaz Sharpen AI but not with Gigapixel AI. I don’t know if they’ve fixed Sharpen AI yet – it’s a great sharpening and deblurring tool but I haven’t got around to really testing it yet.

  6. Douglas Ritchie

    Hi Andy, Agree totally with your latest assessment, it has been steadily getting better and better, the results are superb and allied with Sharpen AI just perfect.

  7. Pingback: Topaz Studio V2 Released - Andy Bell Photography

  8. Pingback: New products - Andy Bell Photography

  9. Pingback: It's Black Friday! - Andy Bell Photography

  10. Pingback: Topaz Labs 25% Off Sale - Andy Bell Photography

  11. Pingback: Adobe Alternatives-Photo Software for 2019/2020 - Andy Bell Photography

  12. Mary Aiu

    I just purchased this software. I do composites using my images in Photoshop and save as a PSD. Have you had experience with composites having the same good results? I’m not sure it would make a difference.

    • AndyBell

      I don’t have experience of using it with composite images, but I can’t see why it wouldn’t work with them. You might need to convert the images to TIF files first – I’m not sure it will open PSD files.

  13. Frank Gross

    A few questions if I may please –
    My interest was piqued after viewing a video talk by Nick Knight on his exhibition of still life’s of roses which he shot on his iPhone and blew up to 5 or 6 feet !!!!
    He talked about using Topaz gigapixel and sharpen. But did say that there is a “texture”, unlike grain or pixelation, that goes with the territory. Can anyone elaborate on that?
    I’m also curious to know what the ‘order of operations’ is – do you first enlarge (gigapixel) and then sharpen (aisharpen) as you would conventionally?
    I usually shoot raw images and process them in ACR prior to saving as a Tif. In ACR I do some sharpening. Is it best to skip this sharpening altogether? If I need to resize (upscale) I do this in ACR too.
    Thanks
    Frank

    • AndyBell

      Frank

      Sometimes Sharpen, when correcting out of focus or motion blur, can leave a texture – this indicates that the settings are not optimal and you need to adjust them more. Of course, some images may be beyond repair and won’t ever look perfect. The texture occurs when Sharpen has tried to ‘line up’ pixels that are blurred but hasn’t quite achieved it.

      I’ve not seen texture with Gigapixel, not with sharp and detailed images in any case.

      My sharpening strategy is:

      A little touch during RAW processing in Luminar 4 or PhotoNinja

      Denoise AI if needed

      Sharpen AI after further tweaking of the image

      Maybe a little more sharpening after resizing, depending on how it looks.

      When upsizing Gigapixel provides that final sharpening. After downsizing a touch of extra sharpening can help if you are printing.

      Andy

  14. Pingback: Topaz Gigapixel 5.3 - a new release, a new test - Andy Bell Photography

  15. Barbara Harrison

    Hello Andy,

    I am in the throws of a decision. I have an old EOS 6D with EF L lenses. I am researching and researching try to figure out whether I need the Canon R 5 over the R6. I want to leave my options open. I am wondering if Gigapixel 5.3 would solve the quality of making large detailed prints using the R6 which from what I’ve googled prints 300 dpi, the most common resolution in commercial printing, the EOS R6 can print images up to 463mm × 308mmI. I currently own Affinity Photo. I would value your input.

    • AndyBell

      Hi Barbara

      Interesting question! I looked at DXOMark.com and it shows that, from a sensitivity point of view, both cameras are very similar. Both will produce excellent pictures.

      My experience with AI Gigapixel is that it produces excellent enlargements when doubling or even quadrupling the size of photos, especially with a high resolution, high quality image. It will, no doubt, provide excellent results from EOS R6 photos and you’d probably have to pixel peep at 100% to spot any real differences between its results and an unaltered EOS R5 image.

      As an experiment, I took two pictures – one with my camera at full resolution and one at half size, which I then upscaled with Gigapixel. Gigapixel’s result was pretty much indistinguishable from the higher res photo. Here are the results.

      When printing at 300 DPI, many minor flaws wouldn’t show up, especially when viewing the print at a normal viewing distance.

      If money is the issue, then I think you’d do well with the R6. If money is not an issue, then the R5 has capabilities the R6 doesn’t, including the dual pixel feature, which gives you more RAW development options, especially with Canon’s own Raw DPP tool.

      My experience of EOS R cameras is that they do well with old ‘L’ lenses and even better with their new RF-L lenses. In the end, the quality of the glass you put on the camera probably has more impact on the resulting image than anything else… The R6 + an RF-L lens may be a better use of your $$$…

      Andy

  16. Pingback: Gigapixel AI vs A High Resolution Image - Andy Bell Photography

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *